Difference between revisions of "Debate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added contributors) |
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added category) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Design_patterns]] <!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | [[Category:Design_patterns]] [[Category:Patlet]] [[Category:Design Patterns for E-Learning]] [[Category:Online Learning System]]<!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | ||
Latest revision as of 11:12, 15 May 2017
| Debate | |
| Contributors | E-LEN Project Team |
|---|---|
| Last modification | May 15, 2017 |
| Source | Design expertise for elearning centers (2005)[1] |
| Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
| Usability | |
| Learning domain | |
| Stakeholders | |
Students are sometimes reluctant to challenge each others' views. Ask two or more students to 'speak' to each side of a motion, open the discussion to everyone in the discussion group, summarize, and end with a vote on the motion[1].
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
Example
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Design expertise for elearning centers (2005). Retrieved from http://www2.tisip.no/E-LEN/documents/ELEN-Deliverables/booklet-e-len_design_experience.pdf.