Difference between revisions of "Assessment Instruments"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added contributors) |
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added category) |
||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Design_patterns]] <!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | [[Category:Design_patterns]] [[Category:Patlet]]<!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | ||
Revision as of 13:18, 3 May 2017
| Assessment Instruments | |
| Contributors | Joseph Bergin, Christian Kohls, Christian Köppe, Yishay Mor, Michel Portier, Till Schümmer, Steven Warburton |
|---|---|
| Last modification | May 3, 2017 |
| Source | Bergin et al. (under development)[1] |
| Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
| Usability | |
| Learning domain | |
| Stakeholders | |
Develop a set of instruments that implement the Assessment Criteria Listwhile ensuring Constructive Alignment.[1]
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
Example
References
- ↑ Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 First mentioned in Bergin, J., Kohls, C., Köppe, C., Mor, Y., Portier, M., Schümmer, T., Warburton, S. (2015). Assessment-Driven Course Design - Fair Play Patterns. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, PLoP 2015. New York:ACM