Difference between revisions of "Abstraction Gravity-From High to Low"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added contributors) |
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Edited spelling) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Infobox_designpattern | {{Infobox_designpattern | ||
|image= <!-- Provide the filename of the image to be displayed (e.g., Design_pattern.png) --> | |image= <!-- Provide the filename of the image to be displayed (e.g., Design_pattern.png) --> | ||
|contributor= [[Joseph Bergin]], [[Jutta Eckstein]], [[Markus | |contributor= [[Joseph Bergin]], [[Jutta Eckstein]], [[Markus Völter]], [[Mariana Sipos]], [[Eugene Wallingford]], [[Klaus Marquardt]], [[ Jane Chandler]], [[Helen Sharp]], [[Mary Lynn Manns]] | ||
|source= Bergin et al. (2012)<ref name="Bergin2012">Bergin, J., Eckstein, J., Völter, M., Sipos, M., Wallingford, E., Marquardt, K., Chandler, J., Sharp, H., and Manns, M.L. (2012). Pedagogical patterns: advice for educators. Joseph Bergin Software Tools.</ref>. | |source= Bergin et al. (2012)<ref name="Bergin2012">Bergin, J., Eckstein, J., Völter, M., Sipos, M., Wallingford, E., Marquardt, K., Chandler, J., Sharp, H., and Manns, M.L. (2012). Pedagogical patterns: advice for educators. Joseph Bergin Software Tools.</ref>. | ||
|dataanalysis= <!-- If applicable, list of data analyses used for mining the pattern separated by a " , "comma --> | |dataanalysis= <!-- If applicable, list of data analyses used for mining the pattern separated by a " , "comma --> |
Revision as of 14:11, 15 February 2017
Abstraction Gravity-From High to Low | |
Contributors | Joseph Bergin, Jutta Eckstein, Markus Völter, Mariana Sipos, Eugene Wallingford, Klaus Marquardt, Jane Chandler, Helen Sharp, Mary Lynn Manns |
---|---|
Last modification | February 15, 2017 |
Source | Bergin et al. (2012)[1]. |
Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
Usability | |
Learning domain | |
Stakeholders |
Introduce concepts that must be understood at two levels of abstraction first at their highest level, then link this to the lower level abstraction by using reflection on the concept[1].
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
Similarities with General Concepts First.