Difference between revisions of "Abstraction Gravity-From High to Low"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) m (Edited format) |
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added category) |
||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Design_patterns]] [[Category:Patlet]]<!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | [[Category:Design_patterns]] [[Category:Patlet]] [[Category: Pedagogical Design Patterns]] [[Category:Traditional Classroom]]<!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> |
Latest revision as of 06:52, 12 May 2017
Abstraction Gravity-From High to Low | |
Contributors | Joseph Bergin, Jutta Eckstein, Markus Völter, Mariana Sipos, Eugene Wallingford, Klaus Marquardt, Jane Chandler, Helen Sharp, Mary Lynn Manns |
---|---|
Last modification | May 12, 2017 |
Source | Bergin et al. (2012)[1]. |
Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
Usability | |
Learning domain | |
Stakeholders |
Introduce concepts that must be understood at two levels of abstraction first at their highest level, then link this to the lower level abstraction by using reflection on the concept[1].
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
Similarities with General Concepts First.