Your Choice,My Choice

	Your Choice,My Choice
Contributors	Joseph Bergin, Christian Kohls, Christian Köppe, Yishay Mor, Michel Portier, Till Schümmer, Steven Warburton
Last modification	June 6, 2017
Source	Bergin et al. (in press 2015); Bergin et al. (2016)
Pattern formats	OPR Alexandrian
	Usability
Learning domain
Stakeholders

Create a menu of assessments that are designed to cover all of the required elements and add simple rules to how the learner can choose the tasks they wish to tackle in such a way that they will always have a balanced diet.^[1]

Context

Problem

Forces

Solution

Consequences

Benefits

Liabilities

Evidence

Literature

Discussion

Data

Applied evaluation

Related patterns

Example

References

↑ ^1.0 ^1.1 First mentioned in Bergin, J., Kohls, C., Köppe, C., Mor, Y., Portier, M., Schümmer, T., Warburton, S. (in press 2015). Assessment-Driven Course Design - Fair Play Patterns. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP 2015). New York:ACM
↑ Bergin, J., Kohls, C., Köppe, C., Mor, Y., Portier, M., Schümmer, T., & Warburton, S. (2016). Student's choice of assessment. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP 2016)(p. 22). New York:ACM.

[Bergin2015-1] 1.0 ^1.1 First mentioned in Bergin, J., Kohls, C., Köppe, C., Mor, Y., Portier, M., Schümmer, T., Warburton, S. (in press 2015). Assessment-Driven Course Design - Fair Play Patterns. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP 2015). New York:ACM

[2] Bergin, J., Kohls, C., Köppe, C., Mor, Y., Portier, M., Schümmer, T., & Warburton, S. (2016). Student's choice of assessment. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP 2016)(p. 22). New York:ACM.

[1]

[2]