Misconception Assessment
| Misconception Assessment | |
| Contributors | |
|---|---|
| Last modification | September 27, 2016 |
| Source | Bergin et al. (2015)[1][2] |
| Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
| Usability | |
| Learning domain | |
| Stakeholders | |
Explicitly assess the students for common misconceptions of threshold concepts in order to identify necessary corrective actions.[1][2]
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
Example
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 First mentioned in Köppe, C., Portier, M., Bakker, R., & Hoppenbrouwers, S. (2015). Lecture Design Patterns: More Interactivity Improvement Patterns. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP 2015). Pittsburgh, USA.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Bergin, J., Kohls, C., Köppe, C., Mor, Y., Portier, M., Schümmer, T., & Warburton, S. (2015). Assessment-driven course design foundational patterns. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, EuroPLoP 2015 (p. 31). New York:ACM.