Kinds of Exam

	Kinds of Exam
Contributors	Joseph Bergin, Jutta Eckstein, Markus Völter, Mariana Sipos, Eugene Wallingford, Klaus Marquardt, Jane Chandler, Helen Sharp, Mary Lynn Manns
Last modification	May 16, 2017
Source	Bergin et al. (2012)
Pattern formats	OPR Alexandrian
	Usability
Learning domain
Stakeholders

Use different kinds of exams. The exams should respect the Different Approaches^[2], which serve the students learning capabilities since every person benefits differently from the usage of her own sensory modality capability^[1].

Context

Problem

Forces

Solution

Consequences

Benefits

Liabilities

Evidence

Literature

Discussion

Data

Applied evaluation

Related patterns

Example

References

↑ ^1.0 ^1.1 Bergin, J., Eckstein, J., Völter, M., Sipos, M., Wallingford, E., Marquardt, K., Chandler, J., Sharp, H., and Manns, M.L. (2012). Pedagogical patterns: advice for educators. Joseph Bergin Software Tools.
↑ Bergin, J., Eckstein, J., Manns, M. L., & Wallingford, E. (2001). Patterns for gaining different perspectives. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP 2001).

[Bergin2012-1] 1.0 ^1.1 Bergin, J., Eckstein, J., Völter, M., Sipos, M., Wallingford, E., Marquardt, K., Chandler, J., Sharp, H., and Manns, M.L. (2012). Pedagogical patterns: advice for educators. Joseph Bergin Software Tools.

[Bergin2001-2] Bergin, J., Eckstein, J., Manns, M. L., & Wallingford, E. (2001). Patterns for gaining different perspectives. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP 2001).

[1]

[2]