Table Arrangement
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Table Arrangement | |
| Contributors | Astrid Fricke, Markus Völter |
|---|---|
| Last modification | May 16, 2017 |
| Source | Fricke and Völter (2000)[1] |
| Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
| Usability | |
| Learning domain | |
| Stakeholders | |
Arrange tables in a way that supports the selected Work Forms. You should either choose an arrangement that can be easily rearranged to adapt to changing Work Forms, or, if rearrangement is not possible, you should select one that can be used for as many Work Forms as possible[1].
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
Arrange tables in a way that supports the selected Work Forms. You should either choose an arrangement that can be easily rearranged to adapt to changing Work Forms, or, if rearrangement is not possible, you should select one that can be used for as many Work Forms as possible[1].
Example
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Fricke, A., & Völter, M. (2000). SEMINARS: A Pedagogical Pattern Language about teaching seminars effectively. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP 2000) (pp. 87-128). New York:ACM.