Difference between revisions of "Kinds of Exam"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added contributors) |
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added category) |
||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Design_patterns]] <!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | [[Category:Design_patterns]] [[Category:Patlet]]<!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> |
Revision as of 13:37, 4 May 2017
Kinds of Exam | |
Contributors | Joseph Bergin, Jutta Eckstein, Markus Völter, Mariana Sipos, Eugene Wallingford, Klaus Marquardt, Jane Chandler, Helen Sharp, Mary Lynn Manns |
---|---|
Last modification | May 4, 2017 |
Source | Bergin et al. (2012)[1] |
Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
Usability | |
Learning domain | |
Stakeholders |
Use different kinds of exams. The exams should respect the Different Approaches[2], which serve the students learning capabilities since every person benefits differently from the usage of her own sensory modality capability[1].
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
Example
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Bergin, J., Eckstein, J., Völter, M., Sipos, M., Wallingford, E., Marquardt, K., Chandler, J., Sharp, H., and Manns, M.L. (2012). Pedagogical patterns: advice for educators. Joseph Bergin Software Tools.
- ↑ Bergin, J., Eckstein, J., Manns, M. L., & Wallingford, E. (2001). Patterns for gaining different perspectives. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, PLoP 2001.