Difference between revisions of "Checkpoints"

From Open Pattern Repository for Online Learning Systems
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Edited source)
(Edited patlet)
Line 14: Line 14:
}}
}}


It is hard to synchronize participants' experiences in a non-linear MOOC where interaction between participants is important to its success because participants approach the activities in a different pace or order and sometimes they go into independent explorations outside of the MOOC activities.  Create regular "checkpoints" which offer participants some breathing space to help synchronize the course flow or pace and catch up on the socal vibe and notice recent highlights<ref name="Mor2015"/><ref name="Mornd"/>.
Create regular "checkpoints" in social, non-linear MOOCs where participants approach activities in a different pace in order to help synchronize the course flow, catch up on social vibe and notice recent highlights.<ref name="Mor2015"/><ref name="Mornd"/>.


==Context==
==Context==

Revision as of 10:31, 21 June 2016


Checkpoints
Contributors
Last modification June 21, 2016
Source Mor and Warburton (2015)[1]; Mor and Warburton (n.d.)[2]
Pattern formats OPR Alexandrian
Usability
Learning domain
Stakeholders

Create regular "checkpoints" in social, non-linear MOOCs where participants approach activities in a different pace in order to help synchronize the course flow, catch up on social vibe and notice recent highlights.[1][2].

Context

Problem

Forces

Solution

Consequences

Benefits

Liabilities

Evidence

Literature

Discussion

Data

Applied evaluation

Related patterns

Example

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Mor, Y. & Warburton, S. (2015). Practical Patterns for Active and Collaborative MOOCs: Checkpoints, FishBowl and See Do Share. eLearning Papers (42).
  2. 2.0 2.1 Mor, Y., & Warburton, S. (n.d.). Design patterns-MOOC Design Patterns. Retrieved from http://www.moocdesign.cde.london.ac.uk/outputs/patterns June 7, 2016.